AUTHOR AND HIS MEANING: HIRSCH’S CRITIQUE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS
Keywords:
GadamerAbstract
In this article are presented the critical remarks that E. D. Hirsch made from the intentionalistic position, in his book Validity of Interpretation, about the philosophical hermeneutics of H.-G. Gadamer. We take into consideration the discussions about author’s intention and the so-called “intentionalist fallacy” in recent literature about esthetics. Several arguments are made, relativizing the intentionalist concepts.
References
Ханс-Георг Гадамер, Истина и метода, Веселин Маслеша, Сарајево, 1978.
Е. Д. Хирш, Начела тумачења, Нолит, Београд, 1983.
G. Frege, ”Über Sinn und Bedeutung“, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, NF 100, 1892, S.;
„О смислу и номинатуму“, Идеје, год. VI (1975), бр. 1.
W. K. Wimsatt, Jr. & M. C. Beardsley, ”The Intentional Fallacy“, u: The Verbal Icon. Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, 1954.
R. Stecker, Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech and the Law, Blackwell, 2003.
A. Kiefer, ”The Intentional Model in Interpretation“, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 63 (2005), No. 3.
S. Davies, ”Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value“, British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 46 (2006), No. 3;.
S. Irvin, ”Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning“, Philosophy Compass, Vol. 1 (2006), No. 1-2.
S. Davies, ”Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value“, 239f.
Ханс-Георг Гадамер, „Ко сам ја и ко си ти?“, у: Х.-Г. Гадамер, Филозофија и поезија, Службени лист, Београд, 2002.
Pierre Joris, ”Celan/Heidegger. Translation at the Mountain of Death“, in: A. Bodenheimer / Sh. Sandbank (hrsg.), Poetik der Transformation: Paul Celan – Übersetzer und übersetzt, Tübingen, 1999, takođe (URL): http://wings.buffalo.edu/epc/authors/joris/todtnauberg.html.
Е. Д. Хирш, Начела тумачења, Нолит, Београд, 1983.
G. Frege, ”Über Sinn und Bedeutung“, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, NF 100, 1892, S.;
„О смислу и номинатуму“, Идеје, год. VI (1975), бр. 1.
W. K. Wimsatt, Jr. & M. C. Beardsley, ”The Intentional Fallacy“, u: The Verbal Icon. Studies in the Meaning of Poetry, University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, 1954.
R. Stecker, Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech and the Law, Blackwell, 2003.
A. Kiefer, ”The Intentional Model in Interpretation“, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 63 (2005), No. 3.
S. Davies, ”Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value“, British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 46 (2006), No. 3;.
S. Irvin, ”Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning“, Philosophy Compass, Vol. 1 (2006), No. 1-2.
S. Davies, ”Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value“, 239f.
Ханс-Георг Гадамер, „Ко сам ја и ко си ти?“, у: Х.-Г. Гадамер, Филозофија и поезија, Службени лист, Београд, 2002.
Pierre Joris, ”Celan/Heidegger. Translation at the Mountain of Death“, in: A. Bodenheimer / Sh. Sandbank (hrsg.), Poetik der Transformation: Paul Celan – Übersetzer und übersetzt, Tübingen, 1999, takođe (URL): http://wings.buffalo.edu/epc/authors/joris/todtnauberg.html.
Downloads
Published
10-31-2006
How to Cite
Радојчић, С. (2006). AUTHOR AND HIS MEANING: HIRSCH’S CRITIQUE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS. Nasleđe, 3(5), 51–64. Retrieved from http://nasledje.kg.ac.rs/index.php/nasledje/article/view/61
Issue
Section
Studies
